With the recent arrival of the
films based on J.R.R. Tolkien’s classic work, it is understandable that books
about the books have arisen. In Finding God in The Lord of the Rings,
Bruner and Ware explore several scenes/events from the books and examine the
relationship to the Bible, Christianity, and the Christian walk. True, there
are parallels that can be drawn, and according to materials Tolkien wrote that
are referenced in the epilogue of this book, that was part of Tolkien’s intent.
According to The Tolkien Society (www.tolkiensociety.org)
J.R.R. Tolkien was a devout Catholic, so this shouldn’t be entirely surprising.
A person who is devout to any religion should have aspects of those beliefs
coming into play in all that he or she does.
While I have only read the
excerpts supplied by the authors, what they have provided tells me that
their approach to their book is at least somewhat justified. They tell
readers in the epilogue that they wrote their book from a Christian
perspective, and I have no reason to believe that their intentions were
anything but noble.
The comparisons that Bruner and
Ware draw could be used as a springboard into spiritual discussion with
an unbeliever. Many people of all ages have seen the movies, so it
should be easy to say, “Remember the scene where ___________ happened?
Well, that’s very similar to the Bible where ____________ happened.”
There will obviously be differences between the Bible and Tolkien. For
instance, I have heard the argument that Frodo represents Christ. Sure,
Frodo carries the Ring to the place where it will ultimately be
destroyed and it is basically his sole responsibility to see the quest
through to the end. This is like Christ bearing our sins on the
cross…no one else could have done it. However, like all analogies
pertaining to Christianity, the parallel breaks down when Frodo decides
he wants to keep the Ring for himself. Even Frodo could not ultimately
resist the sway of the Ring, while Christ never faltered in His
resisting the Devil and abstaining from sin It is vital to keep this
in mind when using anything other than the Bible to explain the Bible.
Personally, I would hesitantly
suggest using such a method to approach evangelism. Using sources
outside the Bible can lead to confusing the unbeliever as to what you
are really trying to say. Instead, I would suggest following the method
used by Ray Comfort and described in his book
Hell’s Best Kept Secret. Briefly,
the method involves starting a conversation with a person to be able to
relate to them on some level that doesn’t involve spirituality (which,
admittedly, could stem from a movie or book, like The Lord of the
Rings). This is followed by finding out where the person is
spiritually, which leads to a discussion of concepts such as the
existence of God, how good a person has to be to go to heaven (or how
bad a person has to be to go to hell). Next, you can use the Law
to show that there is not one person who is able to meet God’s standards
on their own and that the person you are talking to is desperately in
need of salvation. Finally, you can show them that what Christ did
is the only sufficient method for salvation. There is only one source
of divine revelation – the Bible. We have been given it to know the
Lord and to tell others of Him. Our first thought should be to use it
before the fallible and often misleading sources of men.
(01/17/06)
(back to
reviews) |